Han So Hee has written a new letter about her relationship.
On March 15th, rumors of a romantic involvement between Ryu Jun Yeol and Han So Hee surfaced, only to be later denied by Han So Hee's agency.
Hyeri, Ryu Jun Yeol's ex-girlfriend (they were together for 6 years before their breakup last November), swiftly took to social media in response to the couple rumors, posting a cryptic story with the message: "It's fun " and unfollowing Ryu Jun Yeol on Instagram.
In response, Han So Hee addressed Hyeri directly through her own Instagram story, clearly stating that she did not have a relationship with Ryu Jun Yeol while he was still with her.
Following this, despite the agency denying the couple rumors the previous day, Han So Hee herself announced her relationship with Ryu Jun Yeol on March 16th.
Subsequently, Ryu Jun Yeol's agency also confirmed their relationship.
On March 18th, Hyeri decided to issue an official statement on the matter, apologizing for her impulsive reaction and discussing her past relationship with Ryu Jun Yeol.
The actress wrote:
“I'm tired of any further speculation. Pursuing happiness in life has brought me to this point. After meeting various people, I realized that wasting time due to superficial judgments was futile. Now in my thirties, I'm no longer young and am seeking direction in life. It was during this journey that I met this person. It was exactly in November 2023 at a photo exhibition (our first encounter).
I will ignore nonsensical comments claiming prior acquaintance. There was no such connection – not even the bear at home was a gift, but rather purchased via KakaoTalk in 2021. Unlike my naive dating days, where looks seemed like everything, I've learned that they aren't everything. I felt healthier both physically and mentally as I embraced more daring aspects of myself.
I felt it was a necessary connection, as is often the case between a man and a woman. It's important to note that I had no intention of disrespecting my former partner's time. It's true that we parted ways last year. We exchanged final well-wishes, but it's not to divulge personal romantic histories or imply transition.
However, the suggestion to meet in November, as mentioned in the senior's apology letter, wasn't about rekindling anything. While I can't elaborate further, it wasn't for the purpose of reunion.
If this is untrue, feel free to publish a rebuttal article and please contact the senior who remains unreachable despite attempts to reach out in all directions.
I'm also frustrated because one of the parties involved is staying silent, leaving room for speculative articles alleging deceitful relationships. Therefore, I'm writing based on factual information from both sides, regardless of my emotions. I want to clarify that I'm not taking sides unless naive, and I don't want to harm my supporters, fans, or company representatives. I'm writing to protect those I care about. Ultimately, the breakup happened in November, as reported. Regardless of which company is involved, the truth is the truth. I fail to understand why some articles insist on fabricating stories and treating speculative claims as facts. Please provide concrete evidence and refrain from straying off-topic. Seeing critical comments, most likely from anonymous accounts, is amusing. Please bring forth accurate evidence for criticism. Moreover, it's disheartening to see comments veering off-topic, targeting my family, upbringing, appearance, and other irrelevant aspects. I've apologized. If it hasn't reached everyone, I'm not concerned. I apologize to the senior's fans for my impulsive actions. I'll address any mistakes, even over time.
I'm curious about the amusement derived from my ex-partner's swift rebound. Why label casual messages as desperate pleas, then remain silent about a new relationship four months later, attaching the label of transition without explanation? I seek clarity, not sympathy.
Additionally, I'm puzzled by journalists' aggressive demeanor at the airport. Despite being respectful, it feels like I have no say in how I'm perceived.
I understand this post may cause unease at work, but I'm prepared for comments urging restraint. I'm unsure about the mixed signals – whether to explain or remain silent. Hence, I'm writing this to provide clarity. My profession relies on public trust and love. I apologize for mishandling the situation. However, the term "transition" is inappropriate, and it's not a figment of my imagination. Please highlight where I've failed to apologize, and avoid mere criticism without reflection. I don't wish to engage with those harboring ill feelings or consuming my identity.
